The original item has sold for US $139.98. We have selected another similar item below. Original Item: New Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Lens 75 300 mm xsi |
|
|
Want to learn more about this item? View Description View Description View Description Otherwise, you may consider the great buys below. |
provided by Reviews![]() For the price, not a bad lens. Review created: Mar 28, 2008 by: andgott Pros:Light, Very inexpensive Cons:OK build quality, Somewhat soft images The Bottom Line:At this price point, it's a great lens. Don't expect too much of it, and you won't be disappointed. It's a great telephoto zoom for most users! Review:If you have a Canon Digital SLR, and just the kit lens that it came with, there is no doubt that you...read full review Canon EF 75-300mm f4-5.6 III - Decent Starter Telephoto... But Not Much More Beyond That Review created: Jan 26, 2008 by: soupcraze Pros:Light-Weight; Inexpensive; Smooth Zoom Cons:Softness; Rotating Front Element; Cheap Build The Bottom Line:The Canon EF 75-300mm f4-5.6 III is Canon's lowest-end telephoto kit lens. It will make true amateurs happy, but beyond that there are better options. Review:As I was looking into getting a nice mid-range telephoto lens for myself, I borrowed a low-end Canon...read full review Fair Value For The Price Range Review created: Dec 29, 2006 by: digitalduck Pros:A Good Every Day Lens For The Semi Pro Cons:Loose A Little Clarity With Fully Extended Zoom. The Bottom Line:-- Review:This is a good quality family use lens. If photographing the kids on a swing, or the pooch chasing a...read full review The hidden gem of the Zuiko Digital line! Review created: Jul 17, 2006 by: rfman Pros:Excellent macro performance, very sharp, lightweight, inexpensive. Cons:Not weatherproofed. Maximal aperture is not extremely fast. The Bottom Line:Superb sharpness and macro performance for the price. Unless you require a weatherproof lens, this one is a no-brainer. Review:Continuing my review series of Olympus Zuiko Digital lenses for the Four Thirds system digital camer...read full review Get the IS version if you can afford it--not the best of Canon's offerings Review created: Apr 07, 2005 by: suemccartin Pros:good zoom range, light Cons:slooowwwww (high max aperature), no IS system. The Bottom Line:There are better choices. If you need high focal length a single lens may be a better choice. Not up to Canon's usual high standards. Review:I bought this lens at the same time I bought my digital rebel body because I wanted a somewhat long...read full review A solid higher-end consumer lens Review created: Mar 09, 2005 by: huntzinger Pros:If you want a lightweight & effective 300mm lens, this is a great choice. Cons:Some reports of incompatibility with the 10D digital body. The Bottom Line:Strikes a very good balance between weight, cost and optical performance. Review:Its always hard to get the perfect lens. Especially if you don't want to spend a ton of money. In th...read full review Great consumer overall zoom lens. Review created: Jul 28, 2004 by: andrewma Pros:IS rocks. Great zoom, great over all lens, quick focus. Light weight Cons:Not a fast lens. but nothing else wrong with this lens at all. The Bottom Line:Great overall consumer lens. Review:IS is a great help in slightly lower light situations. The IS is not a replacement for a fast lens a...read full review Not Canon's best...but still a decent lens. Review created: Apr 22, 2004 by: mffan310 Pros:Affordable, adequately sharp Cons:Not "L-lens" sharp The Bottom Line:-- Review:A couple of months ago, I bought a Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III lens for my Elan 7E to introduce mysel...read full review Cheap zoom lens from canon Review created: Apr 16, 2004 by: slayek Pros:Zoom range and price Cons:Very slow, noisy, poor construction- lot's of plastic, rotating front element, soft at long range The Bottom Line:-- Review:I bought this one used in like new condition from Bay. Slapped the lens to my Elan 7 body, and boy,...read full review Lens reliability - possible design error? Review created: Mar 23, 2004 by: hunor_demeter Pros:Many features Cons:Reliability is not good The Bottom Line:-- Review:Both my Cannon lenses suffered the following problem after 3 year of use: the zooming gets blocked,...read full review Good for the price. Review created: Sep 16, 2003 by: lv_designer Pros:- Good zoom range. - Good quality for price. Cons:- No image stabilization. - Poor auto focusing in low light conditions. The Bottom Line:-- Review:This is a good quality, entry-level camera lens which provides a wide zoom range. I purchased it al...read full review Reach out for a good shot . . . Review created: Jul 18, 2003 by: leon0687 Pros:excellent general range solid quality USM motor Canon brand Cons:poor AF in low light EXTREMELY slow (f/4.0-5.6) bulky, large, and heavy The Bottom Line:Changing rooms, lighting, etc. makes your photos suffer. Nonetheless, this is a good lens for the money you will pay. Review:Well, what can I say about this lens? First of all, let me give a fair appraisal of the good poin...read full review My only lens Review created: Sep 05, 2002 by: Abel2 Pros:Large Range (75mm to 300mm), Image Stabilizer, Quick Auto Focus in good light. Cons:Bad Auto Focus in low light The Bottom Line:Fun lens for closeup and distance photography Review:This is currently my only lens! It is a little bit big for taking close pictures (min focal length...read full review Great Lens for the Money Review created: Feb 06, 2001 by: hsurden Pros:IS works great - Improves ability to take hand-held shots several stops; Good sharpness! Cons:Heavy; Slightly dark colors at full zoom The Bottom Line:This will improve your picture taking by helping to eliminate blurring caused by shaking. Buy this lens over any other zoom for your Canon. Review:This lens is about the best you can do for the money without resorting to the heavy special glass pr...read full review A wildlife photographer's dream Review created: Sep 07, 2000 by: boerewors Pros:stability, speed(IS off), versatility, price Cons:weight, decreased speed(IS on) The Bottom Line:-- Review:History: I have always been fascinated shooting wildlife (animal and human) in their natu...read full review Canon Zoom Lens Perfect for Every Occasion Even Portraits Review created: Sep 07, 2000 by: shazzle99 Pros:Durable, Versatile, Fast Auto Focus, Superior Stabilization, Generally Lightweight Cons:Like all zoom lenses, this is not ideal for those real "close" shots - Use Your Point-n-Shoot at Gramma's 80th Birthday Bash The Bottom Line:-- Review:If you havent heard, I like to take pictures. Let me rephrase that. Im hopelessly, utterly, path...read full review the inexpensive alternative Review created: Jul 02, 2000 by: MrPatate Pros:inexpensive, light Cons:soft, vignetting, poor construction, small aperture. The Bottom Line:-- Review:The 75-300 does the job and that's all. It has no features that make you say WOW! Constru...read full review Canon 75-300 III USM: Inexpensive and handy! Review created: Jun 19, 2000 by: soulgrind1 Pros:Low price, nice lens range to have Cons:fairly high aperture (f/4-5.6) The Bottom Line:-- Review:This lens was very cheap, and very nice addition to my gear. I bought the lens for a little under $...read full review Expensive, yet still a bargain! Review created: Jun 12, 2000 by: LaBruja Pros:Image stabilization. Cons:Expensive The Bottom Line:-- Review:This lens had barely hit the "streets" when I first tried to buy it. Advance publicity had...read full review Buy with image stabilization, or buy a super-zoom Review created: May 10, 2000 by: northrup Pros:Cheap Cons:Cheaply made The Bottom Line:-- Review:I bought this lens when I was new to photography, and it was *not* a good choice. It was inexpensiv...read full review |